Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Posts by Month

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Attention emergency physicians: How about 8 hour shifts?

Share on Twitter Twitter | Share on Facebook Facebook | Submit to Digg digg it |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon |  Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn | 

By Imamu Tomlinson, MD, Dan Culhane, MD, John Ruffner

It's been suggested that the best emergency physician work schedule is 24 one-hour shifts per month. If pigs could fly! It seems the 12 hour shift is the most popular, but is it the best?  (It came from emergency medicine's operating needs, and had little to do with patient considerations).

More relevant discussions center around ER shift lengths of 7 to 12 hours. After numerous discussions with colleagues about shift length, we asked: "What's wrong with 8 hour shifts?" The following are the findings of some of the key components of this discussion:  

Scheduling  Shorter shifts create more flexibility in drawing up the schedule (covering open days) and allows for better matching of provider hours to patient volume throughout the day. Shorter shifts also mean a provider will work more days in a month.

Productivity  Many emergency physicians have described their experiences of substantial productivity drop-off in the last two hours of a 12-hour shift as they anticipated the arrival of the shift change. One comment seems to capture this dynamic: "With an 8-hour shift, it seems like a new provider is coming on just as productivity starts to drop." Another common response was: "It makes it easier to stay an extra hour when needed."

Clinical Decision Making Many colleagues expressed a concern about the quality of clinical decision making over 12-hour shifts. There really isn't conclusive data on this element, but there is a risk associated with the increased number of ‘hand offs' associated with more scheduled shifts. 

Quality of Life  Numerous colleagues provided their experience with shorter shifts, many of whom saw themselves as 12-hour providers - that's just who they were. 

Here are some comments of those who converted to 8 hours shifts:

"Having 8-hour shifts is like having a real life."

"I don't feel that I'm working as hard."

"I don't know of any site that has converted to shorter shifts that has gone back to 12's."

"The nursing staff and our mid levels tell us it feels like they have more help."

"Working more days but on the days I work, I can get stuff done."

"I saw 35 patients on one of our 7-hour shifts and feel productivity is enhanced."

"Shorter shifts changed my life."

"As I get older, the short shift really works for me"

"I sure haven't seen any negative impact on patient care."

We'd love to hear your thoughts on emergency physician shifts. What about 8 hours?

Comments

8 hours are great for some places but 10 hours work for others; the 12's are too painful to contemplate at this stage of my life. At a super busy site 8's are better but I think shorter than 8 means having to work more numbers of days/ nights & that cuts into family time for me.
Posted @ Friday, February 19, 2010 2:42 PM by Mary Kaye Ashkenaze
As someone who currently works a mix of 12s and 8s in the ER, I can say I MUCH prefer 12 hour shifts primarily for the simple fact that I would spend fewer days at the hospital if i worked only 12s. Although there is certainly still time left in the day after an 8 hour shift to get things done and it IS less of a mental/physical drain on a person than a 12, I really don't enjoy spending the majority of the days in my week at work - regardless of how much I may love my job. As the saying goes: A bad day of (fill in your hobby) beats the best day at work. That saying certainly holds true for me. Also, the increased number of completely free days in my personal schedule that can come with working only 12s can also make it much easier to attend cme conferences because of the lessened chance of being in a position where I'll have to find someone to cover my shift. Plus i'll hopefully get to hold onto more of my PTO hours by having a slightly lesser chance of being scheduled for work in the first place. Lastly, unless the pay rates were adjusted across the board to make up for the loss of those last 4 hours of time-and-a-half pay that comes with 12 hour shifts, I think a lot of providers would be a little unhappy. 
 
 
 
I can certainly see how 8s would appeal to a certain demographic, such as those with children at home, etc, but I would really like to work only 12s.
Posted @ Friday, February 19, 2010 10:44 PM by Chris Robertson
Comments have been closed for this article.